the crossover movement website
February 2008
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
« Jan   Mar »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829  

RSS feed

The Cross Over Movement Blog

Big Time College Athletics 

February 2nd, 2008

On cnnsi, I saw an article summarizing a series of articles in the Seattle Times which paint a terrible picture of big time college athletics. One of the names and stories caught my attention because it mentioned that one of the players visited South Africa in 2001, as did I.

The article was about Anthony Kelley, a football player at University of Washington who visited South Africa in 2000 and 2001. UW has a program where students take a series of classes in several countries: South Africa, Cyprus and Northern Ireland, I believe. Around 2000, one of the students in this class fell in love with Cape Town and had his parents help him buy two houses in a nice neighborhood between downtown and the University of Cape Town. When I visited in 2001, I stayed at one of his houses (actually, I stayed in both at different times). Almost every one else staying in the house at the time was from University of Washington. Kelley and his family stayed downstairs and I had a room upstairs.

Almost every day, the girls from the article came to the house to meet with Kelley and his family. I was there doing basketball clinics and hanging out with friends. We did not interact much, but he did say he was trying to raise money to bring the girls to the USA to perform and raise awareness for these kids in South Africa. He seemed like a good dude.

After returning from South Africa in the spring of 2002, Kelley, along with his wife, began raising money to bring the African girls to Seattle.

The Kelleys hosted a ’70s party, a spaghetti dinner and an auction. Tonya’s goddaughter sold lemonade for 50 cents a cup.

The media picked up the story. The UW hailed Kelley as the ideal student-athlete. Rick Neuheisel donated $5,000. So did Bill Gates Sr.

The Ipintombi dancers, as the troupe would be called, arrived in Seattle in June. They performed at the Paramount Theatre, among other venues.

The article talks about Kelley using football to escape the gangs around his Los Angeles area home despite borderline grades. Then, when he developed a reason to learn and an appreciation for learning and the opportunity he had, it cost him on the football field, where his commitment was questioned. I know a girl at a DIII college who quit playing basketball this season becasue she wanted to study abroad, and while the coach could not do anything to prohibit it, she was certainly not pleased with the players decision and was critical of the player.

This, of course, is the problem when we confuse the college environment with the minor leagues. Big time college sports act like professional leagues with the highly paid coaches, national television, alumni donations and more. As the article writes, academics is an afterthought in these programs:

The 2000 season was Winter’s third as an academic coordinator at the UW. She used to teach English in Ohio. Now she worked one on one and in groups with Kelley and other football players.

She’d meet them in the Conibear Shellhouse on Lake Washington, where the crew team launched its boats. As she listened and taught, she came to see the athletes as vulnerable and isolated from other students.

Demoralized, sometimes in tears, many flirted with failing grades. “The personal cost for so many of them was so very, very high,” she says. “They had a real struggle with personal failure. It would be repeatedly, on a daily basis, an inability to meet expectations.”

One player on the 2000 team left the UW barely able to read or write, Winter says. She would go through textbooks with him, looking at pictures, reading captions, trying to capture main ideas. For essays, he would dictate while she typed.

The Shellhouse became a safe haven for players, a place they could vent. Some players walked in and dropped their heads on their desks, exhausted. “They were scheduled from before the sun came up until 8 or 9 at night,” Winter says.

After the 2000 season, Winter quit. She saw only hype surrounding “special admits,” a misplaced belief they were rising above. “They are running a business at the expense of the kids,” she says. “I felt like I was feeding the business, rather than helping.”

The faculty athletics representative in 2000 was Robert Aronson, a law professor. Charged with protecting the educational welfare of student-athletes, he resigned the post in 2004 and wrote an 11-page letter telling why.

The “pressure to win” compromised academics and integrity, Aronson wrote. The athletic department pressured the admissions office to accept student-athletes who were unlikely to succeed in the classroom. Then, teams demanded too much of their players’ time, preventing them from growing as students.

I know a girl who transferred from a DI program because the coaches insisted she change to a less time consuming major. How can universities defend this attitude toward academics?

My business partner and I tell kids: Use Basketball. Don’t let basketball use you. That’s how I live my life. I use basketball to see the world, make an impact on people, pursue my interests and more. Kelley learned the same lesson, as football gave him an opportunity he might never have had otherwise. Rather than end up as an Al Bundy-like ex-football player, his experience transformed his life and ultimately the lives of so many more. He is the example of the positive role a college scholarship can have. And, his coaching staff disapproved his efforts, demanding a single-minded devotion to football.

It’s great to root for the alma mater and to cherish March Madness. But, college athletics is still about the education. Well, in today’s world it really isn’t, but it should be. I support the NBDL because I believe players with little to no interest in education should have a place to play and earn a living in an atmosphere that does not undermine the academic integrity of a university.

If you are a high school student, last time I checked, 1 Dream Foundation was looking for two more players to go to South Africa this spring for a 10-day trip to Jo’burg and Cape Town. As someone who went to Cape Town twice, I cannot recommend the experience enough.

Elite Coaching and Hiring 

February 2nd, 2008

The United States Olymic Committee published an article on elite coaching and its trends based on some interviews with the various national team coaches.

The article found that:

experience overwhelmingly remains the major way that coaches develop a coaching style, followed by modeling or observing successful coaches. Those two methods alone account for over 87% of a coach develops their coaching style.

If experience is the major way one develops a coaching style, how does one get experience? That is always the question. I always find it interesting when I look at NBA rosters and see fired ex-college coaches serving as assistant NBA coaches or scouts. They were fired from their job, and they move to a higher level. But, of course, they have experience, and the connections experience affords. But, if you don’t have experience, how do you get hired to get the experience? This study suggests that a coach who has been a Head Coach at a lower level might be the better choice over an assistant at the same level; for instance, hiring a high school head coach over a college assistant for a college job. But, that never happens. However, if developinga coaching style requires experience, then that college assistant is basically learning on the job as a head coach making a huge salary and there is no guarantee of success.

Does this mean there are better ways to hire coaches? Does it suggest that maybe there are other, better ways for developing a coaching style, though nothing fully replaces experience?

As the article says:

If this is a tendency for young coaches as well, it raises an important issue for future coach development. Can we only hope that the young coach has a good coach to learn from or had a good coach as an athlete? The old adage of “you coach how you have been coached” is an area that coaching education may need to address.

I often argue against the “follow your mentor” approach because coaches blindly do what they have always done without thinking about why they do it. The way we teach certain things becomes the absolute way to do it whether it makes sense or not just because so many coaches do it a certain way.

In terms of body of knowledge, coaches ranked the following three at the top:

1. Skills of your sport
2. Strategies of your sport
3. Teaching of Sport Skills

Apparently knowing the skills and strategies is more important than being able to teach the skills. As for the areas of study, coaches studied:

1. Skills
2. Sport Psychology
3. Strategies
4. Biomechanics
5. Physiology

At an elite level, I have to believe you know the skills required. For instance, I understand basketball skills. I do not spend anytime, really, studying basketball skills. I study physiology and biomechanics to find a better way to perform the skills or train athletes. If I study basketball literature, I do what has always been done. In an effort to find a better way to do things, I study outside basketball to incorporate that learning into my basketball background to improve my teaching and training. This also gives me a greater creativity in my teaching, as I am not beholden to basketball drills. Yesterday, to teach a concept, I used an old soccer drill, but changed it to basketball. If I had read through more basketball literature, I would have continued doing the same basketball drills. However, the players loved the new drill and it actually worked in our next game.

The end of the article offered a list of 20 additional insights of attributes and skills important for coaches, which I found interesting:

1. Ability to instill belief/trust/confidence in athletes
2. Big Vision, balanced by ability to set and adjust goals
3. Care about others more than self
4. Perseverance and a sense of humor
5. Attention to skills development of athletes; tailored to athlete needs
6. Precise training techniques and coaching on a daily basis
7. Ability to filter
8. Problem solving orientation
9. Ability to observe without judgment
10. Desire to improve through knowledge
11. Quality Decision makers under pressure
12. High level of integrity and fairness
13. Ability to multi-task with equal amounts of high energy
14. Knowledgeable and with an ability to transfer knowledge simplistically
15. Focused on the process
16. Creative, open minded to new ideas and approaches
17. Having thick skin
18. Flexible, but decisive
19. Excellent instructional skills, ability to deliver messages
20. Understands critical zone training

Maybe in the hiring process, or coach development process, we need to develop a matrix or test which demonstrates these qualities in an individual. In one of the management books I have read this year, it talks about how the best managers hire for talent, not experience. However, another book suggests that managers conducting interviews rarely come to a consensus on the best choice. If the best managers hire for talent, but struggle to agree, how can we develop a better way to hire coaches which involves measuring for talent? Typically, coaches get their first jobs based on their playing career, which proves very little about one’s aptitude as a coach. Once a coach gets his foot in the door, its basically connections and recommendations by someone of influence. Rarely is coaching talent measured or considered. These recommendations possibly offer some thoughts as to a better way to hire a new coach.




Home | About | FAQs | Book | Blog | Contact | Forum | Links | Search
© 2008 Youth Basketball Coaching and Player Development